
news
newsletter
subscribe
submit articles |
back
| reload
news
articles submitted
Business
and The UNITED NATIONS
by Paul O. Pederson
-
Introduction
Our business world today is
increasingly complex and its purpose cannot be viewed as solely to
maximize profits, nor on the other hand can it be assumed that its
major purpose is other than making a profit and increasing shareholder
value. Those enterprises whose value chains span our global commercial
world are particularly challenged to first understand and then to act
in ways that may seem unusual for those of us who are accustomed to
business in the United States.
Many of the practices, standards and institutions that we take for
granted in the United States are different in many countries or
non-existing in some parts of the world. Today in 2004 many standards,
regulations and customs have been in existence in the U.S. for 50 or
even 100 years. The rule of law that underpins commercial practices
has evolved over several hundred years from our nation’s beginnings.
To those of you who are involved in global business, this is old news.
But even in the complex world of global business, there are many
business conventions and methods to resolve differences that we have
grown to assume and depend upon. The United Nations (UN) has been one
of the major facilitators of the smooth flow of global commerce. The
following comments provide a brief insight into some of these areas
where the activities of the UN help global business.
- How the United Nations Help Business
The UN is a vast organization. After nearly 40 years of serving the
business corporate community as a CPA and Management Consultant, I had
very little knowledge about the United Nations beyond what the
newsmakers provided me. To me it sounded as if the UN Security
Council, UN Nuclear Inspections and UN parking fines in New York were
the sum total of its activities. After retiring I spent some time
researching the area of corporate responsibility at the University of
Dallas and participating in several conferences of the UN Global
Compact. I learned much more about this network of people that was
formed at the end of World War II with significant sponsorship of the
United States.
Did you know that parts of this vast UN organization help business in
many rather obscure and sometimes technical matters? In addition to
the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade
Organization, there are twelve specialized agencies that help to
maintain the commercial order and openness that business depends upon.
Examples of this include such things as:
- When ships sail freely across the
seas and through international straits, rules legitimized in the UN
protect them.
- Commercial airlines have the
right to fly across borders, and make emergency landings due to
agreements facilitated in the UN Civil Aviation organization.
- Intellectual property agreements
regarding copyrights, trademarks and patents are promoted through
the UN affiliated World Intellectual Property Organization.
- The UN’s World Health
Organization sets criteria for pharmaceutical quality and standard
names for drugs.
- The UN’s Universal Postal Union
protocols allow mail to move across national borders.
- The allocation of airwaves to
telecommunications are based in the standards of a UN agency,
- And, the UN’s World
Meteorological Organization helps establish the standards that make
worldwide weather forecasts possible.
So, when our ships sail, the planes fly,
and when technology is sold worldwide, the UN has played some role in
making it possible. Likewise, when we travel, make telephone calls, have
health concerns and depend on weather the United Nations has helped us.
- The United Nations Global Compact
Now let us turn to the Global Compact. I would like to start with a
quote by the late Sergio Vieira de Mello. You will no doubt remember
that he was the UN’s special representative in Iraq who was killed by
a terrorist attack on the UN mission in Baghdad August 19th, 2003. Mr.
de Mello was the UN high commissioner of human rights. In the 2003
edition of a prominent academic publication he said and I quote:
“The UN Global Compact is a voluntary initiative to promote good
corporate citizenship. I want to stress that it is not, and must not
be, a mere public relations exercise.
A commitment to the Global Compact has to lead to concrete actions in
support of the core principles.
None of this is meant as a substitute for action by governments.
Rather, the compact is a platform for showing how markets can be made
to serve the needs of society as a whole.”
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proposed the idea of forming the
Global Compact at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in
1999. Since then the Global Compact has developed and evolved rapidly.
It was formed in Mid-2000 when the Secretary General hosted a meeting
of senior executives of 50 major corporations and the leaders of
labor, human rights, environmental and development organizations. From
this beginning the organization has grown to include over 1,200
companies. In addition, 17 business associations participate,
including the International Chamber of Commerce, The Conference Board,
and Business for Social Responsibility. There are also 24
organizations representing civil society that have become
participating members of the Global Compact. They include such
organizations as Amnesty International, Transparency International,
Conservation International and the International Federation of Free
Trade Unions that has 156 million members worldwide.
Just a few of the corporations familiar to us here in the Dallas /
Fort Worth area that are members of the Global Compact include:
Alcatel, British Petroleum, Daimler Chrysler, Dupont, Cisco Systems,
Hewlett-Packard, Nestle’, Nike, Nokia, Pfizer, Royal Dutch/Shell
Group, STMicroelectronics, The GAP Inc., Unilever
And the large accounting firms are members including:
Deloitte, Touche & Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, KPMG
PricewaterhouseCoopers
So you are probably thinking – just what is the UN Global Compact? Is
it another costly bureaucracy? The answer is NO! The Global Compact
has a staff of less than a dozen and that includes an intern or two.
The Global Compact is a voluntary corporate citizenship initiative. It
is not a regulatory instrument nor does it police or enforce the
behavior of companies. Rather, the Global Compact relies on the
enlightened self-interest of companies, labor and civil society. It
relies on them to initiate and participate in pursuing the Compact’s 9
principles.
Those who are part of the Global Compact believe voluntary initiatives
and regulatory systems complement each other and provide a powerful
encouragement for the wide spread adoption of responsible corporate
citizenship and sustainability.
In summary, the Global Compact is a voluntary initiative and provides
a framework to promote sustainability and good corporate citizenship.
It is not a regulatory instrument, a code of conduct or legally
binding standard.
The next thing I asked about the Global Compact was “just what does it
do?” The Global Compact provides a way for its members and others to
participate in four activities:
- It organizes global dialogs on
tough problems. Annually there are a number of action-oriented
meetings. These dialogs include timely topics, such as The role of
the private sector in zones of conflict, that reflect a serious
effort to work out very difficult problems in today’s complex world.
- The Global Compact helps in
establishing local networks in industries and in countries where
business, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and other groups work
together on the application of the 9 UNGC principles.
- It organizes learning forums
where companies, NGOs, and those involved in academic and corporate
education meet and share cases and best practices.
- And fourth, it encourages
companies to participate in partnership projects with other UN
Agencies and civil society organizations aligned with the UN’s
agreed upon development goals.
So, how does a company become a part of
the Global Compact? Remember that this is a voluntary initiative. The CEO
simply sends a letter to United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan
expressing support for the Global Compact and its principles. The company
implements the ideas underpinning the 9 principles in the company’s
strategy and its education of its employees, customers and suppliers. And,
it agrees to publish in its annual report or by other means a description
of how it is supporting the 9 principles.
- The Nine Principles of the UN Global Compact
The 9 principles of the UN Global Compact are simple and
straightforward. There are three areas: Human Rights, Labor and the
Environment.
In the first category, Human Rights, a business is asked to support
and respect the protection of international human rights within their
sphere of influence and to make sure that their own corporations are
not complicit in human rights abuses.
For the second category, Labor, a business is asked to uphold the
freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to
collective bargaining. It is also expected to support the elimination
of all forms of forced and compulsory labor and to abolish the use of
child labor. And finally it is expected to support the elimination of
discrimination with respect to employment and occupation.
In the third category, Environment, a business is asked to support a
precautionary approach to environmental challenges and to undertake
initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility. Last in
this category a business is expected to encourage the development and
diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.
In signing up to the Global compact, the business community is
publicly saying that it is prepared to stand up and be judged by its
actions rather than its words. However, for those companies that do
decide to publicly commit to these 9 principles, the Global Compact
should not be thought of as a safe haven to sign up and do nothing.
One observation expressed by a number of business executives about
these principles is that they are matters that corporations subject to
public ownership and oversight are already expected to follow in The
United States because of laws, regulations or accepted good business
practice.
- Conclusion
The public stance of a corporation in our global economy is a
challenge that many business executives face in these times. With
pressures to maximize earnings and shareholder value, where do you
draw the line? Where is this point between not enough involvement in
good works such as the UN Global Compact, and too much involvement?
Just about every large trans-national corporation today has a program
to practice Corporate Citizenship, Corporate Social Responsibility,
Environmental Responsibility and Sustainable Business Practices. This
challenge of determining where to draw this line paints a larger
picture of what a business leader must do to preserve the enterprise’s
role, value and license to do business for the future generation of
our society.
The assessment of and management of risks is becoming one of the most
important responsibilities of CEOs in our post 9/11 tumultuous
economic times. A recent survey of nearly 1400 CEOs on a global basis
indicates that most large corporations have or are developing formal
risk management processes and programs. This survey indicates one of
the most prevalent concerns is that there will be an over-regulation
of business on a global basis. One question that an executive should
consider is whether participating in programs such as the United
Nations Global Compact and the UN’s other activities to facilitate a
global economy are good insurance against unnecessary regulation, and
for the-long term sustainability of their enterprise.
References:
The United Nations and Global Commerce, Mark Z. Zacher, United Nations
Department of Public Information, Development and Human Rights Section,
New York: 1999
United Nations Global Compact:
www.unglobalcompact.org
7th Annual Global CEO Survey – Managing Risk: An Assessment of CEO
Preparedness, PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York: 2004
| Paul O. Pederson is a retired
Management Consulting Partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers and an
Adjunct Professor, Graduate School of Management, University of
Dallas. His education includes BA from University of Washington
and Master of Humanities from University of Dallas. He is
co-author of two management books: Better Change, Irwin 1995 and
Paradox Principles, Irwin 1996. |
Originally published in the University of Dallas Graduate School of
Management - Management Review March 2004
http://udmr.udallas.edu
back
| reload
|